Author Topic: Head + Rocker cover torques...  (Read 2772 times)

Offline Nurse Julie

  • 1977 CB550/4 Mongrel Brat. 1974 UK 500/4 K1. Honda CD250u.
  • Grogu
  • *
  • Posts: 8238
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #30 on: April 08, 2019, 11:56:29 AM »
Looks the part in a handy case, My smallest is 3/8 drive britool about 40 yrs old.
Trig uses the old Britool torque wrenches including the little 3/8 drive.
LINK TO MY EBAY PAGE. As many of you know already, I give 10% discount and do post at cost to forum members if you PM me direct.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/julies9731/m.html?item=165142672569&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.m3561.l2562

LINK TO MY CB400/4 ENGINE STRIP / ASSESSMENT AND REBUILD...NOW COMPLETE
http://www.sohc.co.uk/index.php/topic,14049.msg112691/topicseen.html#new

Offline Lobo

  • Lobo
  • SOHC Master
  • Posts: 1568
  • Lobo
    • View Profile
    • Lobo
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #31 on: April 09, 2019, 10:53:38 AM »
...bloody fantastic forum this; it’s one thing swinging a torque wrench, but another when you’ve been educated as to what’s actually going on. Thanks Nigel.

Offline Bryanj

  • Grogu
  • *
  • Posts: 10796
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #32 on: April 09, 2019, 05:14:23 PM »
Ken, I am ENGLISH (NOT BRITISH) i weigh in stones, drink in pints and buy liquid in ENGLISH gallons. Speed in miles and i am feet tall. Newton was a numpty who should have got out of the way of the apple whilst Celcius should have been strangled at birth along with Kelvin.

If i have missed anything out i appologise and will re rant later!!!

Offline SteveD CB500K0

  • Administrator
  • SOHC Jedi
  • Posts: 4453
  • Ride on the Steel Breeze...
    • View Profile
    • Steve's Blog
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #33 on: April 09, 2019, 05:20:13 PM »
But we all use cc do t we Bryan?

498cc is just over 30 cubic inches. Wouldn’t fit on the side panel would it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
2022 Tiger Sport 660
1971 CB500K0

Offline hairygit

  • SOHC Jedi
  • Posts: 2708
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #34 on: April 09, 2019, 06:38:35 PM »
But we all use cc do t we Bryan?

498cc is just over 30 cubic inches. Wouldn’t fit on the side panel would it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh I don't know, 30/four would be okay!

Sent from my X6pro using Tapatalk

If it's got tits or wheels, it's hassle, if it's got both, RUN!!!

Offline K2-K6

  • Grogu
  • *
  • Posts: 5278
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #35 on: April 09, 2019, 06:55:56 PM »
I think I'm ambi-dexcimal  ;D

Just feel fitter in kg, and the conversion makes it easy to drink "foreign" beer without getting rumbled  :)

Alot of things are better in decimal though:-

Diana Doors vs Bridget Bardot.

Lucas vs Cibié or even the super chic Sev-Marchal.

Austin Maxi vs Citroën DS

 ;D

Offline Bryanj

  • Grogu
  • *
  • Posts: 10796
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #36 on: April 09, 2019, 07:18:54 PM »
Have you ever worked on a DS? 12 workshop hours to change a starter!!

Offline taysidedragon

  • SOHC Master
  • Posts: 1335
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #37 on: April 09, 2019, 07:40:13 PM »
I think I'm ambi-dexcimal  ;D

Just feel fitter in kg, and the conversion makes it easy to drink "foreign" beer without getting rumbled  :)

Alot of things are better in decimal though:-

Diana Doors vs Bridget Bardot.

Lucas vs Cibié or even the super chic Sev-Marchal.

Austin Maxi vs Citroën DS

 ;D

Agreed. Maybe a VW Golf instead of a DS though. 😉
Gareth

1977 CB400F
1965 T100SS

Offline K2-K6

  • Grogu
  • *
  • Posts: 5278
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #38 on: April 09, 2019, 07:47:31 PM »
Point taken about DS,  they still look cool without starting though.

Haven't seen a manual for Bridget Bardot  :D

Offline Moorey

  • SOHC Master
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #39 on: April 09, 2019, 08:14:47 PM »
It always makes me smile whenever I get given a drawing to make something and its a mixture of metric and imperial. A case of whatever is convenient. These days tape measures should only have metric on them. What year did we go decimal.

Offline taysidedragon

  • SOHC Master
  • Posts: 1335
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #40 on: April 09, 2019, 08:27:25 PM »
It always makes me smile whenever I get given a drawing to make something and its a mixture of metric and imperial. A case of whatever is convenient. These days tape measures should only have metric on them. What year did we go decimal.

It makes me laugh too. In Junior school about 100 years ago they taught us imperial and metric, then said we would be completely metric 'very soon!' 😂
Gareth

1977 CB400F
1965 T100SS

Offline Rozabikes Tim

  • SOHC Master
  • Posts: 1191
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #41 on: April 09, 2019, 08:58:50 PM »
When I sell fabric in our shop, we have to sell metric quantities by law and also all our systems are metric based. However, we will talk to some of our older customers in imperial equivalents, so they feel more comfortable.
One day I'll have the time to restore it, not just talk and dream....

Offline TrickyMicky

  • SOHC Expert
  • Posts: 322
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #42 on: April 09, 2019, 09:13:10 PM »
Just a random thought - No matter what part of the world, and no matter how many wheels the vehicle has, what system is used to measure the diameter of those wheels? Dry roads to everybody. Michael.

Offline K2-K6

  • Grogu
  • *
  • Posts: 5278
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #43 on: April 09, 2019, 09:24:11 PM »
You're right,  forgot about those. 

They are inches diameter,  aspect ratio expressed as percentage of width,  which is mostly in millimetres now! Not confusing at all  :)

We drive around in miles still,  but buy fuel in litres.

Aren't mainline railways all the same,  apart from those cunning Spanish chaps?

And off down the pub for a pint of oldsquirrelbollocks, or is that now officially, I'll have a 568.261ml of old peculiar rats nadgers please barkeep.

Offline bucksfizz

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 35
  • 1973 CB750 Four K3
    • View Profile
Re: Head + Rocker cover torques...
« Reply #44 on: April 09, 2019, 09:26:33 PM »
It always makes me smile whenever I get given a drawing to make something and its a mixture of metric and imperial. A case of whatever is convenient. These days tape measures should only have metric on them. What year did we go decimal.

It makes me laugh too. In Junior school about 100 years ago they taught us imperial and metric, then said we would be completely metric 'very soon!' 😂

We can never go completely metric - there are just too many products/protocols out there that are Imperial only.

All pedal cycles use 9/16" BSC (cycle thread or CEI) on the cranks and pedals, and it can never change, otherwise old pedals won't fit new bikes.
All taps use 1/2" or 3/4" BSP (pipe thread) - even in Europe.
A lot of pipes in the UK are 38 mm (a nominal value for 1½").
All socket drives are 1/4", 3/8", 1/2", 3/4" or 1".
Tyres are always in inches for the diameter - I was talking to a tyre fitter who claimed he didn't know Imperial until I pointed tyre diameters  ;).
All aircraft fly in feet (Flight Level 350 = 35,000').
Minimum tyre tread depth is 1.6 mm, but that's just 1/16" translated to metric.
All fence panels are 6' wide.
Standard house doors are 2'6" wide, but I did see a DIY store selling 762 mm doors  :).
Printer quality is measured in DPI (dots per inch).
 
There are probably dozens more examples, but I've probably bored you enough already.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal