Honda-SOHC

SOHC.co.uk Forums => CB750 => Topic started by: Lobo on August 02, 2023, 07:43:20 AM

Title: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Lobo on August 02, 2023, 07:43:20 AM
If not run for 2+ weeks, the K2 will fire up on the button (full choke), but then quickly die - no amount of nursing it on the throttle will work. It’s as though the ignition has failed - which I am 99.9% certain isn’t the case. Typically after 3 or 4 similar such cycles we’ll be successful and get on the road.

Everything about this K2 has been fully restored in the last year, but tbh it did this occasionally before the major overhaul. Once running, the bike runs faultlessly.

Engine totally stock, carb settings by the book, plugs look OK. Boyer Electronic IGN, DR8-ESL plugs. (with resistive caps as unable to source non-resistor plugs). Basically, the bike is as showroom new in every aspect.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Martin6 on August 02, 2023, 07:54:18 AM
Do you keep the bike on a maintenance battery charger? Some electronic ignitions are finicky when voltage drops.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Trigger on August 02, 2023, 08:01:22 AM
Wrong spark plugs and NGK are known to have a lot of copy plugs about. Try Denso plugs  ;)
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Pauarc on August 09, 2023, 07:27:40 PM
Which dense plug fit in place of the ngk
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Nurse Julie on August 09, 2023, 07:59:23 PM
Which dense plug fit in place of the ngk
Denso X24ES-U = NGK D8EA
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Lobo on August 09, 2023, 11:04:06 PM
Thanks all - will try different plugs…
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Skoti on August 10, 2023, 09:20:01 AM
Similar happened to me after a 4 week layoff.
Turned out to be water in the carb float bowls.
Put it down to E10 petrol.

Always use super plus E5 now.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Lobo on August 10, 2023, 11:50:39 AM
Thanks Skoti - appreciated. Tbh though, I’m in the habit of selecting the fuel OFF a mile out from home, and running the ‘bowls dry < putting the K2 to bed. This, I guess, would negate water in the carbs? (also stay away from Ethanol additive fuel)

Martin - apologies, didn’t reply. The bike has all new loom, as new electrical components, clean connectors / earthings etc, and a new LiFe battery - whose characteristics include minimal voltage drop over time (a year at least). And given the very energetic cranking witnessed, I’m confident the battery voltage is just fine.

A suggestion has been made to open the ‘plug gaps up slightly (have electronic ignition) in an effort to provide a ‘better’ spark which might hopefully offset the rich start mixture / cold engine otherwise extinguishing it. Makes sense, and certainly worth a shot; it’ll take a few weeks to verify and I’ll obviously report back.

Cheers…
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: McCabe-Thiele (Ted) on August 10, 2023, 12:43:31 PM
This E10 fuel that has been forced upon us is very Hygroscopic so virtually impossible for it to not absorb water even from the air inside/above  the fuel tank.

Thank goodness for SUL that varies between E0 & E5 max at the moment & Wynns Dry fuel.

For the first time in 20 years our Merc that is only used in the summer months developed a misfire this May on its first outing  - when it went for Mot dealer confirmed it was old fuel - we used to brim the tank for winter now I am running it down so the reserve fuel light is on as well as adding Octane booster in the spring.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: taysidedragon on August 10, 2023, 07:16:45 PM
I agree with Ted. If water is absorbed in the fuel in the tank it will tend to lie at the bottom because it is heavier than petrol. As soon as you open the fuel tap the carb bowls fill with any water laying at the bottom, giving a watery, petrol mix. Not good for starting or running.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Lobo on August 10, 2023, 10:20:13 PM
Cheers Gareth,

I’d argue though that 2 weeks is insufficient to pool any substantial amount of water, but more pertinent is the fact that on Normal (vs Reserve) you’re taking (good) fuel from a couple of inches up.

If a fortnight was enough to cause grief suppliers would have done something about it surely?

Appreciate the thought though.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: McCabe-Thiele (Ted) on August 10, 2023, 10:49:46 PM
I am of the view that the moisture absorption & general deterioration of petrol is not something that immediately settles in the petrol tank as a nice separate layer like in the old glass bowl fuel filters. The vibration of a running engine would soon start to disperse the water droplets so they can move into the float bowl.

If you leave a jar of petrol to evaporate it will leave an almost film like layer of lacquer behind this will block jets quite easily. I had the fuel filter on my Merc replaced as two tanks if SUL were needed before the misfire went on a fuel injected engine.

It might not be the cause of your particular  problem but this E5/E10 petrol does not like sitting in tanks imho
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: K2-K6 on August 11, 2023, 10:27:45 AM
I habitually run tanks out to absolute minimal content (much to my wider family consternation) cars and bikes, initially do a practical check of runout from start of "reserve" light or tap, just so I know how far it will reasonably go, then operate within that for normal use.

Yes i do always fill completely for critical journey logistics  :)

Posted before, with reasoning I think ? use of castor oil for dosing petrol @ 100:1 ratio to (my speculative theory) bind with the E and hopefully prevent or mitigate separation and drop out. Long history of being used with methanol burning motors.

Ad hoc testing.  A mixed jar variously opened with this mix, now about two years old and absolutely clear with no change in homogeneous attributes. 

Work on a lot of small garden machinery, with tiny , tiny carb flows, again with consistent reliability and notable lack of gumming, blocking, decay.
As already mentioned, this is anecdotal and limited to the things I can try.

I look after an old +30 yes V8 with injection, recently starting from 3 month layup and running this mix, sometimes 2mll per 100ml as it smalls nice  :) it started on all 8  on very first try, not even a hesitation, also on really old NGK BPR6ES plugs too  ;D it runs impeccably by any measure and @ closing on 170,000 miles total. It had roughly 25 ltrs in a 80+ tank during storage.

I emphasise, this is anecdotal, my experience, which you’d need to think if it has any benefits if considering trying anything similar. All fuel is straight from cheapest local supermarket and lowest grade.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: McCabe-Thiele (Ted) on August 11, 2023, 10:47:51 AM
I know it's been mentioned before about Castor Oil (CO) but had forgotten about it.

Is CO expensive to buy I'm thinking there are loads of grades/purity on the market. I've used Wynn's Dry fuel  in the past but even E5 SUL has now caused problems in our V8. Might have been under dosed.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Johnny4428 on August 11, 2023, 10:51:41 AM
Interesting findings indeed Nigel. Thanks to you I run 100 to 1 castor oil in the 750 with a bit of exhaust pipe preservation in mind also. Haven’t tried 100 to 2. Maybe no need. Castor oil cheap by the gallon as well. I run Frost’s ethomix in the 550. (Just because I have some) I will probably run castors oil in it too when it’s finished.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: K2-K6 on August 11, 2023, 12:45:50 PM
It's interesting to hear other views independent from my own Johnny, and build a bigger picture.

Its a remarkable oil, but there's of course no magic in these topic. Peter Williams wrote in depth about it's properties and limitations,  which I found very interesting  quite a few years ago.

My 2ml example is on a pumped fuel injection system, low pressure @ 40 psi  but on a loop round to cycle it back to tank after pressure regulator, but with no observations to the detrimental in roughoy 5 years now. Gets a lovely waft of "R" when you boot it with the ecu going full bleed in acceleration pump facility to light up the response.

It doesn't seem to have a probem at that dosage though in carburettor that I've used. An old, 1980's Honda four stroke generator has been on that for 10 yrs or more, with running and starting impeccably even though it's not in action much recently. I never have to clean it for fuel problems, just run it out with fuel tap off, then open tap and it starts within about 3 pull usual from deep storage.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Oddjob on August 11, 2023, 01:59:39 PM
Maybe we should all decant some caster oil into one of those measuring bottles, the one you squeeze and a very small bottle on the side of the cap fills up with a specified amount, that way you'd know to drop say 2 caps full into every tank filling. Average SOHC tank is around 3 gallons or say 13 litres, that's 13000cc if my mental maths is correct, so you'd need around 130cc of caster oil in that case, sounds a lot TBH.

My maths correct?
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: K2-K6 on August 11, 2023, 02:09:39 PM
Yes, correct Ken, 1 ml in 100 fuel.

10ml per litre as you note.

Obviously depends on usage profile, with many collected bikes not doing a great mileage, interspersed with sitting around.

Economics of significant daily mileage may be of different bias, keeping properties too with modern engine and high fuel turnover giving different view as to value etc.

No difference if you're running a blue-smoker  ;D
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: taysidedragon on August 11, 2023, 02:23:47 PM
Cheers Gareth,

I’d argue though that 2 weeks is insufficient to pool any substantial amount of water, but more pertinent is the fact that on Normal (vs Reserve) you’re taking (good) fuel from a couple of inches up.

If a fortnight was enough to cause grief suppliers would have done something about it surely?

Appreciate the thought though.

True, 2 weeks isn't long. I was thinking about longer periods of a couple of months.
On the other hand, light aircraft with piston engines have to drain fuel samples from special fuel drains every day  in the first pre-flight inspection. Transparent containers show separated water at the bottom.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: McCabe-Thiele (Ted) on August 11, 2023, 02:45:58 PM
Is this the type of Castor Oil a 30 grade ?

.https://www.morrislubricantsonline.co.uk/race-c-30-castor-based-motorcycle-engine-lubricant.html
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: K2-K6 on August 11, 2023, 03:14:50 PM
That's a fully formed, with appropriate additives, engine lubricant Ted. Effectively to run in place of "ordinary" engine oil for those users that need it.

I use this, straight undoctored base oil as I'm not testing as primary lubricant https://www.amazon.co.uk/Castile-Liquid-Soap-Base-Litre/dp/B07D8VC7DX/ref=asc_df_B07D8VC7DX/?tag=googshopuk-21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=344409848636&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=11876244962003662064&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=t&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9045911&hvtargid=pla-682847856424&th=1 but as addative effectively.

Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Oddjob on August 11, 2023, 03:56:54 PM
You're burning what is essentially soap in an engine, very weird.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Johnny4428 on August 11, 2023, 04:44:39 PM
I use the same Nigel, probably your recommendation.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: K2-K6 on August 11, 2023, 05:08:08 PM
You're burning what is essentially soap in an engine, very weird.

 ;D ;D

100% pure castor oil, made from beans innit  :) and base oil not only for those race engine oil types, but skin treatment, lipsticks etc, along with Carnuba wax in car polish + lippy too.

Essentially its a mineral oil straight from bean without having to go through millions of years rotting and compressing into crude oil, only for us to get it out of the ground and refine it.

Castor has one of the highest shear/film strength of any oil, hence its useful attributes for this sort of thing.

Wakefield (I believe) was the oil company that predominantly brought it to motor use, so successfully it renamed the company "CASTROL" in a contraction of caster-oil words to define itself.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Lobo on August 12, 2023, 12:01:09 AM
On the other hand, light aircraft with piston engines have to drain fuel samples from special fuel drains every day  in the first pre-flight inspection. Transparent containers show separated water at the bottom.
[/quote]

To be fair here, the issue here is more related to faulty fuel cap seals with the aircraft standing out in rain, washing etc. Light a/c will typically have vertically mounted filler caps, and often recessed - which only exacerbates this. Bad fuel can too be an issue. I’ll stop washing the bike!
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: taysidedragon on August 12, 2023, 12:24:42 AM
On the other hand, light aircraft with piston engines have to drain fuel samples from special fuel drains every day  in the first pre-flight inspection. Transparent containers show separated water at the bottom.

To be fair here, the issue here is more related to faulty fuel cap seals with the aircraft standing out in rain, washing etc. Light a/c will typically have vertically mounted filler caps, and often recessed - which only exacerbates this. Bad fuel can too be an issue. I’ll stop washing the bike!
[/quote]

Not correct.  Even aircraft hangared overnight get water in fuel. Any air space in the fuel tanks has water vapour content which condenses out when the temp drops. Most aircraft I'm familiar with have wing tanks so the filler caps are horizontal on the top surface of the wing. They are designed to prevent rainwater getting in, the same way that our fuel caps are.
Title: Re: ‘750 Start gremlin.
Post by: Lobo on August 12, 2023, 01:55:34 PM
Totally accepted Gareth, condensation in fuel is a concern, and apparently occurs at abouts 1ppm per degree Fahrenheit drop in temperature. At 30ppm upwards it begins to be a problem - enough condensation can lead to a hazardous volume of water in the fuel over time.
Regular fuel drains / topping the tanks of course keep this in check, minimising this as a direct cause of engine failure.

Interestingly, came across this: https://www.casa.gov.au/aircraft/airworthiness/airworthiness-bulletins/water-contamination-aviation-fuel-avgas/mogas

… where it quotes:
“An analysis of defect reports and accident investigations shows that there are five main causes of loss of power and engine failure due to water in the fuel; water entering the fuel tank via faulty fuel cap sealing; water contaminated fuel being pumped into the aircraft fuel tank during re-fuelling, and poorly executed post-refuelling / pre-flight water checks, compounded by unintended water retaining ridges in the bottom of fuel tanks, and flawed water drain location”

Certainly I agree dissolve water becoming free water within fuel (ie with change of temp) is an issue; tho’ hopefully kept at bay with protocols. In the context of engine failure however (this thread), and light aviation, it could be argued that other system failures are generally more to blame?
Cheers,
Simon

Nigel - at great expense have now purchased 4L of Castor oil…. 😬
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal