Honda-SOHC

SOHC.co.uk Forums => CB500/550 => Topic started by: oldboy on November 18, 2019, 04:39:25 PM

Title: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 18, 2019, 04:39:25 PM
In the process of rebuilding a supposedly totally rebuilt 1972. 500. (think I've been fleeced!!) When I rode the bike briefly the front end felt rock hard. Played about with different fork oil and check that everything was straight. Today I removed the fork springs which measured 480mm in length. According to the manual they should be around 425 to 450mm. Plus also there is no long damper rod in these forks making me think there later forks. Would I be right in this assumption?? I've also ordered some progressive springs from Bike Barn as my previous order with Performance Parts never did arrive after waiting nearly six weeks (buyers beware!!)   
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Seabeowner on November 18, 2019, 06:49:56 PM
All 500s K0-K2 had the long damper and this was screwed into the top bolt of the fork leg. Check the back of the fork legs as some are marked (341, 390). Don't think the 323s were marked. According to the manual the spring length is the same 500 and 550 at 451.7mm (but that may be a mistake as there are a number of errors in manual)
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 18, 2019, 07:51:37 PM
Yes I'm beginning to think that the lengths give in the manual could be wrong.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 18, 2019, 10:32:58 PM
Never believe everything you read in a manual or a parts book  ;) 
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 19, 2019, 06:58:48 AM
All 500s K0-K2 had the long damper and this was screwed into the top bolt of the fork leg.
Not on my K2. Scroll down in: http://www.honda4fun.com/home/faq/generali/111-cb500-differenze-k0-k1-k2. The Parts List for my model so far is 100% accurate.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 19, 2019, 07:38:48 AM
All 500s K0-K2 had the long damper and this was screwed into the top bolt of the fork leg.
Not on my K2. Scroll down in: http://www.honda4fun.com/home/faq/generali/111-cb500-differenze-k0-k1-k2. The Parts List for my model so far is 100% accurate.

As I said, don't believe everything you read. A quick scroll down and incorrect info on the switch gear, master cylinder, sub loom, and grab rail  :o
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 19, 2019, 09:02:27 AM
Now I've seen this comparison site I'm afraid to start looking at my supposed 72!!!!!! Brilliant site though
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: JamesH on November 19, 2019, 10:57:44 AM
In the process of rebuilding a supposedly totally rebuilt 1972. 500. (think I've been fleeced!!) When I rode the bike briefly the front end felt rock hard. Played about with different fork oil and check that everything was straight. Today I removed the fork springs which measured 480mm in length. According to the manual they should be around 425 to 450mm. Plus also there is no long damper rod in these forks making me think there later forks. Would I be right in this assumption?? I've also ordered some progressive springs from Bike Barn as my previous order with Performance Parts never did arrive after waiting nearly six weeks (buyers beware!!)   
They sound suspiciously like 750 springs...
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 19, 2019, 12:42:25 PM
All 500s K0-K2 had the long damper and this was screwed into the top bolt of the fork leg.
Not on my K2. Scroll down in: http://www.honda4fun.com/home/faq/generali/111-cb500-differenze-k0-k1-k2. The Parts List for my model so far is 100% accurate.

As I said, don't believe everything you read. A quick scroll down and incorrect info on the switch gear, master cylinder, sub loom, and grab rail  :o
The topic was the damper. Nevertheless all info for the K2 model (ED, F, G) there is correct. Also the CB500K2 Parts List for continental Europe is correct. The only thing you could maybe debate on, is the depiction of the front spring, but who can blame that Japanese fellow for borrowing a pic from elsewhere to avoid drawing all these windings over and over again. ;D
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 19, 2019, 01:00:47 PM
All 500s K0-K2 had the long damper and this was screwed into the top bolt of the fork leg.
Not on my K2. Scroll down in: http://www.honda4fun.com/home/faq/generali/111-cb500-differenze-k0-k1-k2. The Parts List for my model so far is 100% accurate.

As I said, don't believe everything you read. A quick scroll down and incorrect info on the switch gear, master cylinder, sub loom, and grab rail  :o
The topic was the damper. Nevertheless all info for the K2 model (ED, F, G) there is correct. Also the CB500K2 Parts List for continental Europe is correct. The only thing you could maybe debate on, is the depiction of the front spring, but who can blame that Japanese fellow for borrowing a pic from elsewhere to avoid drawing all these windings over and over again. ;D

If you scroll to the top of this thread, the topic is 1972 500. No mention of a K2  ;) 
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 19, 2019, 07:14:01 PM
If you scroll to the top of this thread, the topic is 1972 500. No mention of a K2  ;)
With al due respect, my reply (#4) was a reaction to the statement in reply#1 where it says:
Quote
All 500s K0-K2 had the long damper and this was screwed into the top bolt of the fork leg.
That statement is incorrect. I've limited my reaction to the topic: the fork and did not bring up anything else like: switch gear, grab rails or whatever. FYI, the European K2 came with the same front legs that were on the CB550K2, the ones that have the front disc mounts both left and right. All these details are in the parts lists. I strongly recommend them, the more now various models surface just about anywhere in the world. Of all the Honda documents that I've seen, the parts lists have proven to be the most reliable by far. The Shop Manuals may have errors and so do the Owner's Manuals, the parts lists that I've seen, don't. No wonder; dealers had to rely on them.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 19, 2019, 08:37:18 PM
I'm not actually 100% sure what year/model it is. Registered in 1972. Was informed it had been put back to original spec, but whether that's K1 K2, import or UK I'm now not sure, but with all the info on this forum it's something else to investigate. Thanks for all the reply's so far I'm sure over the coming months there will be more question.   
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Nurse Julie on November 19, 2019, 08:43:47 PM
Well you can narrow it down.... If its a 1st registered UK bike it can only be a K1 (There are a very, very few 1st registered CB500/4 K0's but they were never imported here officially and we know most of them) We never had K2 in the UK model range. Look on the log book, it will tell you if it's imported and if its an import from USA it will have date of manufacture on the VIN plate, UK bikes do not have this.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Bryanj on November 19, 2019, 11:35:19 PM
Pm me the full frame number and i will tell you where it fits in my "list" of compiled numbers and build dates
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 20, 2019, 07:36:04 AM
There never was a model K2 for the UK.
There was a CB500K2-A marketed in the US in 1973.
The different K2 for continental Europe did not arrive before 1976. It came in 3 submodels:
ED European Direct Sales, F the French type and G the Germany type.
For those interested, its parts list is here:
http://www.honda4fun.com/pdf_parts_list/pdf_spac500/CB500-76/CB500-76_1.pdf
http://www.honda4fun.com/pdf_parts_list/pdf_spac500/CB500-76/CB500-76_2.pdf
http://www.honda4fun.com/pdf_parts_list/pdf_spac500/CB500-76/CB500-76_3.pdf
http://www.honda4fun.com/pdf_parts_list/pdf_spac500/CB500-76/CB500-76_4.pdf
This CB500K2 (ED, F, G) was probably assembled in 1975-6 and marketed in continental Europe in 1976-7.
Partslist of the rare CB500K3, a model probably assembled in 1977 and marketed in continental Europe in 1977-8, is here: http://www.honda4fun.com/pdf_parts_list/pdf_spac500-550/CB500-550_K3-K4.pdf
Also useful to identify, after scrolling down, can be: http://www.honda4fun.com/home/faq/generali/111-cb500-differenze-k0-k1-k2.
I have no knowledge of any CB500 model nor CB550 that is not covered in one of the parts lists found here:
http://www.honda4fun.com/materiale-documentazione-tecnica/parts-list/parts-list-cb500 *
http://www.honda4fun.com/materiale-documentazione-tecnica/parts-list/parts-list-cb550
Identification is relative easy: compare engine- and framenumber to those found in the first few pages of the parts lists. You only have to do this once and you'll immediately have all the info on: what carbs fitted, area codes, color schemes and what has been modified from what serial number on within that particular models production timespan. That info is a starting point. If you encounter parts on your model that seem odd, you could consult the other parts lists in an effort to reconstruct what POs may have changed and to verify if such a part is compatible.
I feel the need to apologise for repeating this message so many times. Believe me, my initial goal was to offer access to documents to all of us and so outroot unnecessary posts. The irony now is that I am repeating posts myself.
* Unfortunataly some of the parts lists published at Honda4Fun, in particular the early CB500 models, are in a poor resolution. They may be found in a beter quality elsewhere, possibly here?
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 20, 2019, 12:55:35 PM
All 500s K0-K2 had the long damper and this was screwed into the top bolt of the fork leg.
It was my concern that other readers that have an interest in the topic, could have drawn the wrong conclusion from that false statement. Hence my correction. I'd thought that was clear from the beginning. My apologies if that has not been the case. And with that I yield back.  ;)
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 20, 2019, 04:17:17 PM
Nothing on the log book and no Vin plate!!
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Nurse Julie on November 20, 2019, 04:26:26 PM
Nothing on the log book and no Vin plate!!
Which wouls suggest it's a UK model CB500/4 K1.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 20, 2019, 04:56:46 PM
That's good to know. Just been going through the comparison site that somebody kindly put up and to my amazement most of the parts fitted are right for that model, which is a result!!
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Nurse Julie on November 20, 2019, 05:00:44 PM
That's good to know. Just been going through the comparison site that somebody kindly put up and to my amazement most of the parts fitted are right for that model, which is a result!!
That's great. Just be mindful that the UK model CB500/4 K1 is unlike the same model for any other country / market. We have a UK K1 so if you need any reference photos, or detailed info just ask anytime.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 20, 2019, 07:02:30 PM
Today I removed the fork springs which measured 480mm in length. According to the manual they should be around 425 to 450mm. Plus also there is no long damper rod in these forks making me think there later forks. Would I be right in this assumption??
My guess is you have the same frontlegs that are on my CB500K2-ED*. Last time I had my springs out, they measured over 460mm. Also mine are the type legs without rods. So you just have the later model legs. That's no problem as long they are both the same. BTW, I have best results with fork oil wt 7,5, 140-145cc in each leg. If they are straight, I don't see any reason why they shouldn't work.
You may also read my post here: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,151936.msg1736598.html#msg1736598
* The US CB500K2-A still had the old rodstyle dampers.
 
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 20, 2019, 07:59:42 PM
Thanks for your help, best thing I could have done joining this forum
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 21, 2019, 09:41:59 AM
Oldboy, could you please inform us, after comparing your engine- and framenumber to those that Honda has carefully listed in their parts lists, what exact model you have including the suffix that indicates the market your model was originally intended for. Also I would like to know what 'comparison site' you mean in your reply #21. Thank you very much.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 21, 2019, 09:52:11 AM
Hi Delta, it's confirmed it's a UK K1.  and the web site is in question #4 in this descussion.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 21, 2019, 10:25:50 AM
Thanks for reporting back. Glad to learn the comparison site  http://www.honda4fun.com/home/faq/generali/111-cb500-differenze-k0-k1-k2 has helped.
Remains one other thing to be adressed. There has been talk like:
Never believe everything you read in a manual or a parts book
Now I know of errors in manuals, even Honda's. I collect these errors, so you can do me no greater favour than report them to me. The score so far is that, although I have found quite a few in the Honda Shop manual, in the parts lists that concern the CB500/550 series, I have find... none, although I have some doubts concerning those compiled by American Honda. I volunteer to administrate eventual errors. To be continued.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Seabeowner on November 21, 2019, 10:36:29 AM
Delta, Norton on my PC blocks the Honda4fun site as a dangerous website. Used it in the past.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 21, 2019, 11:37:54 AM
You defiantly have  550 F2/K3 forks. If you compare these two pictures, you will see were the top of the lower lines up with the mudguard.

Pic number 1 is 550 F2 and the second is 500 four K1.

[attachimg=1]



[attachimg=2]
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 21, 2019, 11:39:19 AM
Delta, Norton on my PC blocks the Honda4fun site as a dangerous website. Used it in the past.
Sorry to read that. I don't have that problem and I have no clue what could be the danger.
Anyway, you could also consult: http://cbfourclub.nl/?page_id=1238 where you'll find more or less the same content in pics. You have to click <Onderlinge verschillen in de CB500 modellen> however.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 21, 2019, 08:43:34 PM
Thanks Trigger, So next question, is it the fork bottoms are longer?? Fork tubes shorter, springs the same rate. All I can tell you that it certainly feels very funny on the front end and not the sort of thing you would chuck into a corner.  Tube are straight and forks not twisted, but quite hard and not much movement. Springs are far longer than the manual states, nearly 480mm. Changed the oil  to 10w and waiting for progressive spring. 550 and 500 spring lengths are the same according to the manual. Time will tell!!
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 22, 2019, 06:42:30 AM
Do your legs have the rubber harmonica boots?
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 22, 2019, 07:10:43 AM
Thanks Trigger, So next question, is it the fork bottoms are longer?? Fork tubes shorter, springs the same rate. All I can tell you that it certainly feels very funny on the front end and not the sort of thing you would chuck into a corner.  Tube are straight and forks not twisted, but quite hard and not much movement. Springs are far longer than the manual states, nearly 480mm. Changed the oil  to 10w and waiting for progressive spring. 550 and 500 spring lengths are the same according to the manual. Time will tell!!

Short cases come with longer stanchions ( tubes ) and the springs are different. On the 550K they are different than the 550 F2 / K3.
I am trying to help another member that is local to me but, he has the short cases on a 550K3, which are bottoming out  ;)

The original 500 for cases came with only one case that you could mount a caliper (left side) and a lot of riders removed the early forks so they could fit a double disc and caliper set up.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 22, 2019, 08:48:37 AM
Getting more and more complicated, (think I'll fit a set of Ohlins  ;D ) They do have gaiters fitted and at least now I'm beginning to now what I'm looking at, confusingly!!
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 22, 2019, 09:07:54 AM
Getting more and more complicated, (think I'll fit a set of Ohlins  ;D ) They do have gaiters fitted and at least now I'm beginning to now what I'm looking at, confusingly!!

I have mentioned to the member who has the bottoming out problem that, I maybe a good idea to swap lower cases and springs with you or at least compare spring length  ;)
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: oldboy on November 22, 2019, 01:18:26 PM
Thanks
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Erny on November 23, 2019, 10:44:07 PM
If you allow me, I have one question about correct spring length for 550K1.

I measured mine that has now 462mm.

Looking into service manual, it says 451,7mm as standard for both, 500 (page 140) and 550K1 (page 142).
But forks for 500 and 550K1 are different so I suspect there is mistake in service manual.

Does anyone know proper standard length of 550K1 fork spring and its service limit?
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 23, 2019, 11:11:42 PM
If you allow me, I have one question about correct spring length for 550K1.

I measured mine that has now 462mm.

Looking into service manual, it says 451,7mm as standard for both, 500 (page 140) and 550K1 (page 142).
But forks for 500 and 550K1 are different so I suspect there is mistake in service manual.

Does anyone know proper standard length of 550K1 fork spring and its service limit?

475 mm on K0,K1,K2 and the spring in the picture is not oem  ;)
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Erny on November 23, 2019, 11:38:52 PM
Trig, thanks!
so I suppose OEM are not progressive, right?

Any idea where to buy OEM like or other recommended alternative?

I need to do something to avoid horrible bouncing I have...
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 23, 2019, 11:59:08 PM
not progressive ! Are you sure it is the forks and not the wheel ?
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Erny on November 24, 2019, 12:05:38 AM
typical as many others has - forks does not react on small bumps - looks as too high striction.
Worst it is at stable speed around 40mph
But I want to start with full rebuild. Springs are definitely on the list. But where to get them?  :-\
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 24, 2019, 06:58:23 AM
Not so fast, those are the progressive springs I have in my CB500K2-ED and they are definitely OEM. These springs were also on: the C550K, CB550K!, CB550K2 and the CB500T. They measure the same as mine and should be fine. I have best results with max 140-145 cc of 7,5 weight fork oil.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 24, 2019, 07:19:47 AM
typical as many others has - forks does not react on small bumps - looks as too high striction.
Worst it is at stable speed around 40mph
That's the typical speed where many bikes of that era show let us say a less than ideal behaviour.
Quote
But I want to start with full rebuild.
Why? What starting point is that? What is your diagnosis? What you could do however, is loosen bolts and then tighten them again in the right order. I'm sure others will chime in to tell the right procedure, that gave them best results.
Quote
Springs are definitely on the list. But where to get them?
I have no indication yours are the wrong type or have passed the servicable limit. Mine have the same length, have done 135.000 km and are still OK. You may also want to read this: http://forums.sohc4.net/index.php/topic,151936.msg1736598.html#msg1736598
But if you must... parts number is: 51401-374-003.
https://www.cmsnl.com/products/springfrontcush_51401374003/#.Xdovgq_vJVc
I wouldn't be surprised that after ordering, you will find they will have exact the same length as yours.
As I said before: the Shop Manual CB500-550 has some errors. In my experience the parts lists have none, be it that the depiction of the springs is not very accurate but... who can blame that poor Japanese schlemiel that had to draw all those windings...  ;)
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 24, 2019, 08:18:03 AM
Not so fast, those are the progressive springs I have in my CB500K2-ED and they are definitely OEM. These springs were also on: the C550K, CB550K!, CB550K2 and the CB500T. They measure the same as mine and should be fine. I have best results with max 140-145 cc of 7,5 weight fork oil.

You do make me chuckle in the morning with your ignorance to parts and you just quote what you have read or heard, without having any real hands on experience of all SOHC units  ;)

The measurement i gave was from a NOS 374 spring out of the packet with numbers ending in 000. Todays listed spring is ending in 003, that means it has been superseded or it comes from another supplier meaning, it will be a different spring. Boing goes Zebedee  ;D

Parts lists have many errors to them and, I would not go on CMSNL. As a good example this week is that I sold off a load of  500 air box brackets (323) and everyone that ordered them by part number said, that they had received the wrong bracket as CMS had the wrong picture of the bracket against the wrong part number. But, the ones I sent out were correct  ::) ::)
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Bryanj on November 24, 2019, 08:30:21 AM
Parts books correct! Check the gearbox page and explain to me where the forth selector in the quantity list fits.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Trigger on November 24, 2019, 08:34:21 AM
Parts books correct! Check the gearbox page and explain to me where the forth selector in the quantity list fits.

That's the part you order for your spares box mate  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Bryanj on November 24, 2019, 08:53:17 AM
I did! But the one they say you need 2 of is not the centre one that wears!!!!
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 24, 2019, 09:14:53 AM
Look, it's not that complicated. First time I had my springs out, I discovered the data in manuals like Haynes did NOT apply or I had the wrong parts. It was not the first time I was confused about parts and manuals and it was not until I got the appropiate parts list for my model, that I discovered nothing was wrong. If you use a parts finder like https://www.hondaparts-direct.com/honda-motorcycle-parts you will learn even more, like on what other models that part was, which might help you going for used parts. My model is supposed to have the same legs and springs as the CB550K. So far I have received no complaints about the procedure I recommend: first determine exactly what model you have and then learn more from the appropiate parts list. To me that seems a good starting point. If there then still remain questions, folks in the field like us may know more. As for the other subjects that you bring up like air box brackets, gear selectors, I have no idea what you're talking about, unless you specify what model you refer to and what parts list you think is incorrect. Then we talk, not after some shots in the dark. But I'd rather see you very experienced guys help Ernie by recommending what steps to do first for a diagnosis. Just assuming someone must have put in the wrong springs (I mean: how likely is that?) or that they must be worn, is not a good starting point IMO, the more when on the point of spring length data the Shop manual seems to be incorrect. That's why I communicated Ernie I also ran in the same confusion he did. It was not until I consulted an old Honda mechanic that I found out. He said that I should not worry and informed me that there had been modifications.  He kindly allowed me to copy the Parts List for my model. He also warned me that the pic of the springs was not correct. After I had concluded he was also right on that point, I have seen no danger in communicating his and my findings ever since.
Back to the subject. It takes very little to create stiction. I'm confident some of the experienced mecs here will chime in and advise Ernie the correct mounting procedure and with that I yield back.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 24, 2019, 09:37:15 AM
The measurement i gave was from a NOS 374 spring out of the packet with numbers ending in 000. Todays listed spring is ending in 003, that means it has been superseded or it comes from another supplier meaning, it will be a different spring. Boing goes Zebedee  ;D
First, I'm sorry, but part 51401-374-000 does not exist, nowhere. Part 51401-374-003 does. Second I'd like to inform you that the last digit in a Honda part number refers to the subcontractor, the two digits next (left) to it refer to an eventual modification. BTW, I tell nothing new, these basic info is found in the first few pages of some CB500/550 parts lists.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Erny on November 24, 2019, 12:08:25 PM
Interesting. So still the same question - what is free length and service limit? Maybe there was some error correction issued? (serv bulletin or so)

So I consider mine as OEM based of Delta's info
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 24, 2019, 12:49:50 PM
Another thing came to mind during the Sunday morning walk in the park. On p.137 of the Honda Shop Manual CB500-550 it mentions 6.3-6.5 ozs (185-191 cc) as the prescribed quantity of fork oil. I have always mistrusted that figure. It seems like a lot. On p.77 of the Owner's manual it is less: 160-166 cc http://www.honda4fun.com/pdf_libretti/550/550_73/CB550_4.pdf and according to our american friends in the CB550K2 owner's manual 145cc is prescribed. Yet they all share the same front legs. Another error in the Shop Manual maybe? Now the CB550K, CB550K1 and CB550K2 came with two types of rear shocks: 52400-323-670XW and 52400-390-681XW. Could that explain the difference in front fork oil quantity? Anyway, for the time being my advice for Erny would be: before you might undertake all kinds of unnecessary operations, I'd first experiment with 145cc max. (7,5 wt) and see what the extra air cushion it results in, brings. Please report back.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Bryanj on November 24, 2019, 01:12:01 PM
The higher quantityis for strip and rebuild the lower quantity is for service change. NEVER  trust a Haynes manual without cross refering to genuine Honda
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 24, 2019, 03:08:56 PM
Yeah... and what if the genuine Honda Shop Manual is not consistent with the genuine Honda Owner's Manual?
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Erny on November 24, 2019, 05:38:06 PM
So, pring length is now clarified.
My friend had a look into CB500T HSM, here are data:
Free standard length : 466mm
Service limit : 440mm

So my springs are OK - no need to change them  :)

Oil volume is another story - my CB550K1 genuine owner's manual says 160-166 cc (5.4-5.6 ozs).


Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Nurse Julie on November 24, 2019, 06:09:51 PM
So, pring length is now clarified.
My friend had a look into CB500T HSM, here are data:
Free standard length : 466mm
Service limit : 440mm

So my springs are OK - no need to change them  :)

Oil volume is another story - my CB550K1 genuine owner's manual says 160-166 cc (5.4-5.6 ozs).
Are 500/T forks the same as 500/4 then?
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Erny on November 24, 2019, 06:11:40 PM
Spring is the same p/n
Others not (legs, pipes..)

Seems there are some differences
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 24, 2019, 09:58:50 PM
Excellent research, Erny! Now we know the source of that 185-191 cc. Most likely it was accidentely copied from that CB500T manual. I would not fill yours with more than 160cc max. I have the same legs and springs and I have a little over 140cc in them. I expect others can give you advice on how to address your complaint.
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: Erny on November 25, 2019, 05:57:58 AM
You actually gave a tip - that CB500T shares the same spring - this is where it started
Title: Re: Front forks
Post by: deltarider on November 25, 2019, 04:37:55 PM
I need to do something to avoid horrible bouncing I have...
If you mean up and down, here a few tips. Whenever renewing the front tyre, have a close look at the rims inside where the wall of the tyre sits. Often crusts of rust are overlooked causing a tyre not to sit a 100% evenly. Tyre could develop a flat spot during long periods of inactivity like hibernation. Stiction is often caused by incorrect mounting of the front legs. I was told that 'unrest' in front often has its cause in the rear.
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal