Other Stuff > Misc / Open

Opinions - 400f or 550f

(1/3) > >>

rman:
I don't wish to start an argument, ;D but having set my mind on a 400f have now seen a rather nice but expensive 550f.

To owners of both or either, which would choose and why?

Thanks in anticipation :)

Johnwebley:
I have the middleweight. A 500.
When I bought it.I had a choice of either a low milage 500
Or a new 400.
Since then.a few years ago. I have seldom doubted my decision.
The extra capacity. Makes it easier to ride.not much extra weight.
And not so many gear changes.


Sent from my SM-G361F using Tapatalk

Nurse Julie:
Both totally different bikes and cannot be compared. The 400 is buzzy, needs to be ridden like a 2 stroke, loves being thrashed, hates being ridden with the engine lugging. Hard work to ride properly as need to be up and down the gearbox all the time. Incredible fun, great handling and a true 1970's sports bike. Uncomfortable seat.
550F. Easy to ride, very comfortable, will pull in any gear, doesn't mind being lugged. Great handling. Good on longer journeys. Handles exceptionally well. Comfy.
I have both and love both for totally different reasons.
Edit....parts alot harder to source for the CB550F

Nurse Julie:
Just to clarify, is it a CB550 F1 or F2 or a CB550K ?

Bryanj:
If you have short legs the 400 if not the 550.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page